← Back to Prompts Library

AI Prompts for Coding: GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Replit (2026 Guide)

Master code generation, refactoring, debugging, and testing with production-ready prompts

Prompt Principles These Tools Expect

GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Replit all respond best to single, specific tasks, with clear context and constraints. Official guides recommend:

A reusable pattern for your prompts:

"You are an experienced [language/framework] engineer.
Task: [generate / refactor / explain / debug].
Context: [repo description, file, snippet].
Requirements: [libraries, style, performance, edge cases].
Output: [function signature, tests, comments, or explanation only]."

Below are ready-to-paste prompt ideas grouped by GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Replit Ghostwriter / Replit Agent.

GitHub Copilot Prompts (Editor & Copilot Chat)

GitHub's own docs emphasize comments above function stubs and focused chat questions.

Code generation & stubs

Refactoring & improvement

Debugging & tests

Explanations & documentation

Cursor AI Prompts (Rules, Chat, and In-Editor)

Cursor is designed around prompt-driven edits and repo-aware tasks.

Code generation within a repo

Refactor / multi-file changes

Debugging & migration

Replit Ghostwriter / Replit Agent Prompts

Replit emphasizes clear, single-feature prompts with explicit constraints.

Feature-by-feature building

Cross-Tool Prompt Patterns (Works in All Three)

Best Practices for Coding Tools

FAQ: AI Prompts for Coding

Should I use GitHub Copilot or Cursor for prompting?

GitHub Copilot excels at inline suggestions and chat; Cursor shines for multi-file refactors and repo-aware tasks. Replit is best for full-stack scaffolding. Start with Copilot for quick fixes, Cursor for larger changes.

How detailed should my prompt be?

Balance specificity with brevity. Include language/framework, edge cases, and constraints. Avoid writing a 10-paragraph specification; a focused 3-4 sentences is often better.

Can AI tools generate secure code?

AI can help, but you must review all output. Never trust generated code for auth, encryption, or SQL queries without scrutiny. Use prompts that explicitly mention security concerns.