Produce a discounted cash flow (dcf) for investor (vc, pe, public). COMPANY: a mid-stage private company (B2B SaaS) TIMEFRAME: Last 3 fiscal years historical + 5-year forecast NUMBERS PROVIDED: [numbers not provided — use placeholder inputs tagged [input needed]] KEY ASSUMPTIONS: [no specific assumptions provided — use reasonable market defaults and flag all of them] STRUCTURE: 1) Historical financials summary (revenue, gross margin, EBITDA, capex, working capital — 3 years). 2) Forecast drivers (revenue growth rate, gross margin trajectory, opex as % of revenue, tax rate). 3) Unlevered free cash flow build (EBIT × (1-tax) + D&A − capex − ΔNWC). 4) WACC calculation (cost of equity via CAPM, cost of debt after tax, capital structure weights). 5) Terminal value (Gordon growth OR exit multiple — show both). 6) Present value walk and enterprise value. 7) Equity value bridge (EV − net debt + minority interest adjustments). 8) Sanity checks vs. trading comps. - Use ARR and NRR as primary revenue drivers (not GAAP revenue). CONSTRAINTS: - show all formulas and assumptions; flag every input that needs verification - Every number must be either supported by a provided figure or tagged "[input needed]" / "[assumption — justify]". - Show formulas, not just outputs. - Flag any figure that requires external data (comps, betas, risk-free rate) as "[external data — source needed]". Deliver the analysis only. No preamble.
Financial Analysis
Prompt Generator.
Free, analyst-grade prompts for DCF, comps, 3-statement models, SaaS metrics, variance analysis, M&A deal math, and more.
Formulas visible. Assumptions tagged. Swing factors surfaced. Output built to survive scrutiny from investors, boards, or credit committees.
Role: a senior FP&A or investment analyst known for discounted cash flow (dcf) work that survives scrutiny from investor (vc, pe, public). COMPANY: a mid-stage private company (B2B SaaS) TIMEFRAME: Last 3 fiscal years historical + 5-year forecast NUMBERS: [numbers not provided — use placeholder inputs tagged [input needed]] ASSUMPTIONS: [no specific assumptions provided — use reasonable market defaults and flag all of them] REQUIRED STRUCTURE: 1) Historical financials summary (revenue, gross margin, EBITDA, capex, working capital — 3 years). 2) Forecast drivers (revenue growth rate, gross margin trajectory, opex as % of revenue, tax rate). 3) Unlevered free cash flow build (EBIT × (1-tax) + D&A − capex − ΔNWC). 4) WACC calculation (cost of equity via CAPM, cost of debt after tax, capital structure weights). 5) Terminal value (Gordon growth OR exit multiple — show both). 6) Present value walk and enterprise value. 7) Equity value bridge (EV − net debt + minority interest adjustments). 8) Sanity checks vs. trading comps. - Use ARR and NRR as primary revenue drivers (not GAAP revenue). PROCESS: 1. Produce the full analysis using the structure above. 2. Re-read as a skeptical investor (vc, pe, public) — which single output is most vulnerable to challenge? 3. Either strengthen that output (tighter logic, better source) or explicitly flag the weakness with a "this is the biggest open question" note. 4. Output only the final version. CONSTRAINTS: - show all formulas and assumptions; flag every input that needs verification - All formulas visible. - Inputs tagged "[input needed]" where real data is required. - Market-default assumptions (WACC components, tax rates, terminal growth) must be specified and justified.
Role: a sharp-elbowed analyst producing a discounted cash flow (dcf) that a skeptical investor (vc, pe, public) will try to pick apart. COMPANY: a mid-stage private company (B2B SaaS) TIMEFRAME: Last 3 fiscal years historical + 5-year forecast NUMBERS: [numbers not provided — use placeholder inputs tagged [input needed]] ASSUMPTIONS: [no specific assumptions provided — use reasonable market defaults and flag all of them] REQUIRED STRUCTURE: 1) Historical financials summary (revenue, gross margin, EBITDA, capex, working capital — 3 years). 2) Forecast drivers (revenue growth rate, gross margin trajectory, opex as % of revenue, tax rate). 3) Unlevered free cash flow build (EBIT × (1-tax) + D&A − capex − ΔNWC). 4) WACC calculation (cost of equity via CAPM, cost of debt after tax, capital structure weights). 5) Terminal value (Gordon growth OR exit multiple — show both). 6) Present value walk and enterprise value. 7) Equity value bridge (EV − net debt + minority interest adjustments). 8) Sanity checks vs. trading comps. - Use ARR and NRR as primary revenue drivers (not GAAP revenue). RULES OF THE HOUSE: - show all formulas and assumptions; flag every input that needs verification - Every formula visible. Every assumption justified or flagged. - For any industry-default input (WACC components, tax rate, terminal growth rate, discount period conventions), state the convention you're using and why. - Inputs you don't have must be tagged "[input needed]"; do not invent specific numbers. DELIVERABLE: 1. The full analysis following the structure. 2. A "Top 3 swing factors" section — the 3 inputs that move the answer most, with their impact (e.g., "+100bps to WACC → −$42M EV"). 3. A "Questions the reviewer will raise" section (3-5 questions) — the challenges a skeptical reviewer will bring, with your first-response strategy. 4. A "What I'd go back and verify" list — the inputs that, if I had more time, I'd double-check with source data.
12 analysis blueprints
Scaffolds for every core financial analysis.
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
Unlevered FCF build, WACC, terminal value (Gordon + exit multiple), PV walk, EV to equity bridge, sanity checks vs. comps.
Trading / transaction comps
Peer set selection rationale, multiples table (EV/Rev, EV/EBITDA), outlier exclusions, implied range, premium/discount logic.
3-statement model outline
IS + BS + CF with linking logic, supporting schedules (revenue, opex, headcount, capex, debt), BS balance checks, scenario toggle.
Variance analysis
Line-item budget vs actual with volume/price/mix decomposition, timing vs. permanent classification, forecast impact.
SaaS metrics deep-dive
ARR waterfall, NRR/GRR, CAC payback, LTV, magic number, Rule of 40, cohort retention, public comp benchmarks.
Ratio analysis
Profitability, liquidity, leverage, efficiency, returns — trend + peer comparison + what's improving vs. degrading.
Investment memo
Thesis, market, company, numbers, team, valuation, risks, exits, return scenarios, recommendation with kill criteria.
Annual budget model
Driver-based revenue build, opex by function, capex schedule, working capital, debt service, EBITDA walk, sensitivity.
Sensitivity analysis
Key variables with justified ranges, one-variable and two-variable tables, probability-weighted EV, downside triggers.
M&A accretion/dilution
Pro-forma IS with phased synergies, EPS accretion/dilution by year, breakeven synergy required, strategic rationale.
Cohort analysis
Retention curves (logo + dollar) by cohort, LTV by cohort, payback period by cohort, CAC discipline implications.
Burn & runway
Net burn, months of runway, scenarios (steady / growth / austerity), levers to extend, action triggers by runway threshold.
Analyst-grade output
Why these prompts produce audit-ready analysis.
Every prompt requires the model to show formulas, not just results. You can trace each number back to its inputs — no black-box outputs.
If you didn't provide a number, the output tags it [input needed]. If the model used a market default (WACC components, terminal growth), it tags [assumption — justify].
Variant 3 forces the model to identify the 3 inputs that most move the answer — and quantify their impact. You walk into the review knowing exactly which inputs to defend.
Related free tools
Other generators you might need.
Business Prompt Generator
Marketing, sales, ops, finance, HR, strategy.
Legal Prompt Generator
Contract review, briefs, research, clauses.
Perplexity Prompt Generator
Source-cited research for competitive comps.
ChatGPT Prompt Generator
General RGC-structured prompts for any LLM.
FAQ
Questions about the financial analysis generator.
Is this a replacement for a financial analyst?+
No. This tool generates structured LLM prompts that help analysts produce better first drafts. The output still needs review and the underlying numbers need verification. LLMs aren't spreadsheets — they can approximate structure and logic but aren't a substitute for a rigorous Excel model.
Is this free?+
Yes. 100% free, no login, no rate limit. Inputs stay in your browser — they're never transmitted to a server.
What analyses are supported?+
Twelve analysis types: DCF valuation, trading/transaction comps, 3-statement model outline, budget vs actual variance analysis, SaaS metrics deep-dive (ARR, NRR, CAC payback, magic number, Rule of 40), ratio analysis, investment memos, annual budget models, sensitivity/scenario analysis, M&A accretion/dilution, revenue cohort analysis, and burn/runway analysis.
How are assumptions handled?+
The prompts force the model to show every formula and tag every input either as [input needed] (if you didn't provide it) or [assumption — justify] (if a market default was used). This means the output you get back is auditable instead of black-box.
What's the difference between the 3 variants?+
Variant 1 is a clean direct prompt — fastest to usable first draft. Variant 2 adds a revision pass where the model re-reads as a skeptical audience and strengthens the weakest output. Variant 3 adds a 'top 3 swing factors' section (which inputs move the answer most), 'questions the reviewer will raise' prep, and a 'what I'd go back and verify' checklist.
Does it work for non-SaaS businesses?+
Yes. The company-type selector adapts the prompt for B2B SaaS, e-commerce, marketplace, fintech, consumer, hardware, services, healthcare, media, and other. Each adjusts the revenue drivers and relevant metrics — e.g., SaaS uses ARR/NRR instead of GAAP revenue as the primary lens.
Will these prompts work with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini?+
Yes. The prompts use plain structured English with no tool-specific syntax. They work with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and any modern LLM. For heavy numerical work, GPT-4 class models and Claude Opus produce more reliable formula output than lighter models.