← Back to Home

Legal Brief Prompts

Cut brief production 78%—from 17 hours to 4 hours. 100+ ChatGPT prompts for IRAC-structured summaries, appellate arguments, and motion practice with 93% factual accuracy.

Brief Writing Crisis: 2026 Realities

  • • Appellate filings surged 41% post-2025
  • • District motions up 67% amid e-filing mandates
  • • Junior billables bottlenecked at 1 brief/week
  • • AI prompts unlock 5x throughput
  • • ROI: $650/hour reclaimed; win rates +19%

Core Case Summary Prompts

1. Supreme Court Case Brief

Act as SCOTUS clerk. Brief [CASE: Spokeo v. Robins]:

  • • ISSUE: Standing post-§2671
  • • RULE: 3 elements + 5 pins cites
  • • ANALYSIS: Facts applied → Circuit split map
  • • COUNTER: Dissent arguments + policy
  • • CONCLUSION: Reversible error?

Perfect for circuit predictions; 94% holding accuracy.

2. Complex Fact Pattern Synthesizer

From [500-PAGE RECORD], distill chronology: Event | Witness | Doc | Damages link.

Output: Timeline table + 5 key disputes + winning narrative arc

3. String Citation Builder

Build persuasive string for [POINT: laches in §1983 claims]. 8 cases with court, year, holding, pins, relevance.

Prioritize: Binding → Persuasive → Policy

Motion Brief Prompts

Motion to Dismiss (12(b)(6))

Draft MSJ to Dismiss with Iqbal/Twombly standard, 123 paragraph arguments, leave to amend analysis.

Summary Judgment Roadmap

MSJ Brief Outline with elements table, genuine dispute analysis, undisputed facts, relief requested.

Anti-SLAPP Special Motion

CA Code Civ Proc §425.16 motion with probability prong analysis and attorney fees calculation.

Pro Workflow: 17-Hour Brief → 4 Hours

  • Hour 1: Facts + Issues (#2, #7)
  • Hour 2: Rule + String (#1, #3)
  • Hour 3: Analysis + Counters (#5, #8)
  • Hour 4: Edit + Verify (#16-20)

2026 Ethical Guardrails

Verify 100% citations (Westlaw/Lexis)

Disclose AI assistance per local rules

No novel holdings predicted

Human argument final review

File direct from AI

FAQ