How we tested this
Reviewed with legal research safeguards in May 2026
We rebuilt this guide around research supervision: define jurisdiction, identify sources, synthesize only verified law, and validate citations.
The prompts avoid asking AI to invent authorities and instead produce research plans, questions, and checklists.
How to use these prompts
Start with jurisdiction, date, issue, procedural posture, and source boundaries. Ask for search strategies, issue trees, and memo structure before synthesis.
Prompt map
Workflows and starter prompts
Use these workflows to make legal research more organized while preserving human verification.
| Job | Prompt focus | Starter prompt | Human check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research plan | issue, jurisdiction, search terms, sources | Create a legal research plan for [issue] in [jurisdiction]. Include questions, search terms, source types, and what would change the answer. | Run searches in trusted databases. |
| Case summary | facts, holding, rule, relevance | Summarize this case text into facts, issue, holding, rule, reasoning, and relevance to [client issue]. | Compare summary to the actual opinion. |
| Authority table | binding, persuasive, adverse, unknown | Create an authority table from these verified sources with jurisdiction, court, date, rule, favorable point, adverse point, and citation check needed. | Confirm authority status. |
| Memo outline | question, short answer, analysis, uncertainty | Create a research memo outline for [issue] using only these sources. Include short answer, analysis, contrary authority, and open questions. | Attorney approves final conclusion. |
| Citation validation | quote, pinpoint, current status | Create a checklist to validate these citations, quotes, parentheticals, and whether each authority remains good law. | Use citator tools where available. |
Copy this first
The reusable prompt
Research planning prompts
Use these before running searches.
Prompt 1
Create a research question tree for [issue] with primary, secondary, and factual questions.
Prompt 2
Generate Boolean search strings for [issue] across statutes, cases, regulations, and secondary sources.
Prompt 3
List facts that could change the legal analysis for this issue.
Prompt 4
Create a research log template with query, source, result, relevance, and next step.
Synthesis prompts
Use verified source text only for synthesis.
Prompt 1
Synthesize these verified cases into a rule statement and list conflicts between them.
Prompt 2
Create a table of favorable and adverse authority from these source excerpts.
Prompt 3
Summarize this statute and list elements, exceptions, definitions, and deadlines.
Prompt 4
Draft a neutral research memo from these sources with uncertainty clearly marked.
Validation prompts
The final research answer must be checked outside the AI tool.
Prompt 1
List every legal authority in this memo and what proposition it supports.
Prompt 2
Flag quotes and pinpoint citations that require manual verification.
Prompt 3
Identify jurisdiction mismatch, outdated authority, and unsupported conclusions in this memo.
Prompt 4
Create final attorney-review questions before this research is used in advice or filing.
Legal research safety checks
FAQs
Can AI do legal research?
AI can help plan, summarize, and organize research, but final legal research requires verified sources and attorney judgment.
What is the best legal research prompt format?
Use jurisdiction, issue, date sensitivity, posture, source boundaries, desired output, and validation checklist.
Can AI summarize cases accurately?
It can summarize provided text, but you must compare the summary to the original case and verify the holding and citations.
Can AI tell if a case is still good law?
Do not rely on AI alone for that. Use trusted citator tools or official legal databases.
Can paralegals use legal research prompts?
Yes under appropriate supervision and confidentiality rules, but legal conclusions should be reviewed by a lawyer.
What is the main legal research prompting mistake?
The main mistake is asking for legal authorities without providing verified sources or checking the citations afterward.